Cutlass vs. Scimitar — What's the Difference?

A cutlass is a type of sword that is short, broad, and slightly curved. Often, when people think of a cutlass, they envision pirates or sailors from the age of naval warfare. The design of the cutlass made it particularly useful for close combat on ships, where space was limited and swift movements were required. In contrast, the scimitar is a sword that boasts a distinct curved blade, sharp on its convex side. It's a design that has its roots in the Middle East and is commonly associated with Arabian warriors.

The cutlass, due to its compact design, became a favored weapon for naval combatants. Its short length provided the advantage in the tight confines of a ship. The scimitar, with its unique curvature, was adept for mounted combat, allowing riders to slash opponents while riding without getting the blade stuck.

In terms of appearance, the cutlass often has a more robust, broader blade compared to the scimitar. The scimitar is characterized by its elegant, slim, and pronounced curve, making it easily identifiable. Both weapons, however, were crafted for swiftness and efficient cutting.

The cultural associations of the two swords also differ. The cutlass is embedded in naval and pirate lore, particularly in the Caribbean and Atlantic contexts. Meanwhile, the scimitar evokes images of the vast deserts of the Middle East, horseback warriors, and ancient empires.

To summarize, while both the cutlass and scimitar are curved swords, they differ in design, use, and cultural associations. The cutlass is broad, short, and has naval ties, while the scimitar is slim, elegantly curved, and rooted in Middle Eastern history.