Have To vs. Had To — What's the Difference?
By Tayyaba Rehman — Published on October 12, 2023
"Have to" represents a present or future obligation or necessity, while "had to" indicates a past obligation or necessity. Both express compulsion or requirement.
Difference Between Have To and Had To
Table of Contents
ADVERTISEMENT
Key Differences
"Have to" and "had to" are modal verb phrases used to express necessity or obligation, with "have to" implying present or future situations, and "had to" referencing past circumstances. "Have to" signifies that someone is obliged to do something currently or must do it in the future. In contrast, "had to" means someone was obliged to do something in the past.
"Have to" is used when talking about obligations or necessities that are generally ongoing or are relevant to the present or future, like routines or scheduled events. Conversely, "had to" is used to describe actions that were obligatory or necessary at a specific time in the past, illustrating completed actions or fulfilled requirements.
When utilizing "have to" in sentences, it reflects a sense of urgency or a need to fulfill a duty or responsibility in the present or upcoming time. "Had to," on the other hand, conveys that a task or action was imperative and non-negotiable at a certain point in the past, often emphasizing the unavoidable nature of the obligation.
"Have to" in the English language usually follows the structure of Subject + have/has + to + base verb, allowing for the creation of sentences depicting current or future responsibilities or necessities. On the contrary, "had to" follows the structure of Subject + had + to + base verb, forming statements that explain the need for a specific action or condition in the past.
Comparison Chart
Time Reference
Present or Future
Past
ADVERTISEMENT
Use
To express current or future obligation or necessity
To express past obligation or necessity
Sentence Structure
Subject + have/has + to + base verb
Subject + had + to + base verb
Indication
Ongoing or upcoming obligations or necessities
Completed actions or fulfilled requirements in the past
Tense
Present or Future Tense
Past Tense
Compare with Definitions
Have To
"Have to" is often used to express societal or legal mandates.
Drivers have to obey traffic laws.
Had To
"Had to" can indicate past legal or societal requirements.
Before the law changed, everyone had to pay that tax.
Have To
"Have to" can indicate a non-negotiable condition or stipulation.
To apply for this job, you have to have a degree.
Had To
"Had to" signifies actions or tasks that were unavoidable previously.
Due to the storm, we had to postpone the event.
Have To
"Have to" denotes a requirement or obligation in the present or future.
I have to finish my homework before I can go out.
Had To
"Had to" illustrates conditions or stipulations that were mandatory in the past.
To be admitted, he had to meet all the prerequisites.
Have To
"Have to" is employed to convey a sense of necessity or duty.
You have to wear a helmet when riding a bike.
Had To
"Had to" denotes a completed action that was compulsory in the past.
She had to finish all her chores before going out.
Have To
"Have to" can imply an action imperative for achieving a desired outcome.
If you want to lose weight, you have to eat healthily.
Had To
"Had to" is used to express a past obligation or necessity.
I had to study hard to pass the exam.
Common Curiosities
What does "had to" mean?
"Had to" denotes a past obligation, necessity, or requirement that was fulfilled.
When do we use "have to"?
We use "have to" when expressing current or future obligations or necessities.
Can "have to" be used to indicate legal obligations?
Yes, "have to" can be used to express legal obligations or mandates in the present or future.
When is "had to" used?
"Had to" is used to express obligations or necessities that were present in the past.
What does "have to" mean?
"Have to" represents a present or future obligation, necessity, or requirement.
Can "have to" be used to denote urgent situations?
Yes, "have to" is often used to express urgency or imperativeness in current or future scenarios.
Is "had to" informal language?
"Had to" can be used in both formal and informal language to convey past necessity or obligation.
Is "have to" used in formal language?
Yes, "have to" can be used in both formal and informal contexts to denote obligation or necessity.
Can "had to" signify societal norms in the past?
Yes, "had to" can denote societal norms or expectations that existed in the past.
Can "had to" denote past legal obligations?
Absolutely, "had to" can signify legal obligations or mandates that existed in the past.
Can "had to" reflect urgency in the past?
Yes, "had to" can illustrate that a past action was imperative or urgent.
What is the sentence structure for "have to"?
The structure for "have to" is Subject + have/has + to + base verb.
What is the sentence structure for "had to"?
The structure for "had to" is Subject + had + to + base verb.
Can "have to" be replaced by "must" in expressing obligation?
Yes, "have to" and "must" can often be used interchangeably to express obligation, but they may vary in degree of necessity.
Can "have to" imply societal norms?
Absolutely, "have to" can denote societal expectations or norms in present or future contexts.
Share Your Discovery
Previous Comparison
Rosewood vs. Teak Wood
Next Comparison
MRTP Act vs. Competition ActAuthor Spotlight
Written by
Tayyaba RehmanTayyaba Rehman is a distinguished writer, currently serving as a primary contributor to askdifference.com. As a researcher in semantics and etymology, Tayyaba's passion for the complexity of languages and their distinctions has found a perfect home on the platform. Tayyaba delves into the intricacies of language, distinguishing between commonly confused words and phrases, thereby providing clarity for readers worldwide.
