Nonsensible vs. Nonsensical — What's the Difference?

The term "nonsensible" is less commonly used and pertains to phenomena or aspects that elude sensory detection or perception. It might apply to concepts, feelings, or entities that exist beyond the realm of the five human senses, indicating a lack of sensory experience rather than a deficit in logic or coherence. For example, abstract ideas or theoretical concepts in science and philosophy can be considered nonsensible because they cannot be directly seen, heard, touched, tasted, or smelled.

"Nonsensical" is a more frequently used term that characterizes speech, writing, ideas, or actions that are illogical, irrational, or absurd. It implies a departure from reasoned or coherent thought, often invoking a sense of the ridiculous or the ludicrous. Nonsensical elements are typically discernible by the senses but defy logical interpretation or meaningful understanding. Literary works, such as Lewis Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," often employ nonsensical elements to create whimsical or fantastical narratives.

"Nonsensible" points to an absence of sensory perception, while "nonsensical" highlights an absence of intellectual coherence. The distinction is important in various contexts, including philosophy, literature, and everyday communication. Recognizing whether a subject is beyond sensory comprehension or simply devoid of logical structure can influence the approach to discussing or analyzing it.

Both terms imply a negation, but they operate in different domains: "nonsensible" in the domain of sensory perception and "nonsensical" in the domain of logical or meaningful discourse. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate and effective communication, especially in discussions that navigate complex theoretical or abstract topics.