Unobtainable vs. Unattainable — What's the Difference?

Unobtainable typically describes physical objects or specific pieces of information that, due to various reasons such as scarcity, restrictions, or physical impossibility, cannot be acquired or possessed. On the other hand, unattainable often refers to abstract goals, aspirations, or standards that, no matter the effort or means applied, cannot be achieved due to intrinsic limitations or external barriers.

While both terms denote the concept of inaccessibility, unobtainable items might sometimes become accessible under certain conditions or through changes in circumstances, like the lifting of restrictions or advancements in technology. Conversely, unattainable goals often remain out of reach due to fundamental limitations, such as physical laws, human capabilities, or societal structures, indicating a more permanent state of inaccessibility.

The use of unobtainable often implies a temporary or circumstantial barrier to acquisition. For example, a rare artifact might be unobtainable because it is housed in a secure location. In contrast, unattainable goals, such as perfection in any human endeavor, suggest an inherent or enduring impossibility, not just a temporary or circumstantial one.

The emotional or psychological impact of the terms can differ. The realization that something is unobtainable might motivate individuals to seek alternatives or to change the conditions making it unobtainable. However, confronting an unattainable goal can lead to feelings of futility or the need for a fundamental reassessment of one’s aspirations or strategies.

While the distinction between unobtainable and unattainable is nuanced, understanding this difference is crucial for setting realistic expectations and goals. Recognizing whether a barrier is circumstantial or inherent can guide more effective decision-making and goal-setting processes.